So I was speaking to someone in the publishing industry about my unpublished Urban Fantasy novel, and how my agent and I are preparing to
shop it. "So what's your next step?" they asked. I told them that I was
torn between taking time to gather some good beta readers or just
waiting and letting an editor get their hands on the book. "Which way
are you leaning?" they asked.
This was more difficult to answer.
I totally respect beta readers, especially when they
- Are familiar with the genre
- Take their task seriously (as opposed to just wanting to get a "sneak peek" at an unpublished novel, and
- Are willing to make honest observations (as opposed to just lather the author with praise).
Good beta readers can do wonders for an author and a book.
On the other hand, I feel like this project is tight enough to pass up beta readers and go straight to a professional. In fact, I said something like, "I'd love to have a professional editor dig into this story."
Hopefully, those words don't come back to bite me.
Anyway, I turned the question around and asked this individual what they thought. The answer they gave me was a bit of a surprise.
"From my experience, a good editor will catch a lot more things and have far more insight into improving a novel than beta readers will."
This surprised me, not because it could appear like a diss of beta readers, but because it jibed with how I feel.
A good editor is worth their weight in gold.
I'm one of those oddballs who still respects the "old school" editor. Sure, they've taken some heat as of late. What with self-publishing being all the rage, many authors have seemed to rely less on the industry professional, and more on readers' perspective. After all, your book should appeal to readers more than simply survive some editorial checklist. As a result, the beta reader has replaced the editor in many authors' minds.
Perhaps it comes down to experience. Thus far, my experience with editors have been great. They have definitely improved my stories and made catches that were sorely needed. On the other hand are writing friends who have horror stories about working with unrelenting editors who required huge, unrealistic changes to the story. So maybe it comes down to ones personal experience.
All that to say, this individual's opinion about editors catching a lot more than beta readers really resonated. Sure, at certain stages in a book's life, beta readers may be valuable. But I can't imagine anyone being as important to the production of a good story than a professional editor.
Mike Duran is a monthly contributor to Novel Rocket, and is represented by the rockin' Rachelle Gardner of Books & Such Literary. Mike's novels include The Telling, The Resurrection, an ebook novella, Winterland, and his newly released short story anthology Subterranea You can visit his website at www.mikeduran.com.